On Ethics
This piece first appeared on the Scientists for Global Responsibility forum, in response to post that ended with the comment ‘Ethics are never straightforward!’.
Dear Forum,
It does sometimes look like ethics are not straightforward, but I wonder if that is really true?
To me it seems that ethics appear complicated when the search for a solution to an ethical problem is limited to within the system that produced the problem in the first place. I think that real solutions will mostly lie outside of the system that produced the problem.
So far, all large-scale human societies have been based on humans exploiting other humans for material gain. This doesn’t prove that humans are inherently exploitative, though many have come to that conclusion.
A better model might be that a population conditioned into fear, greed and limitations in thinking is both necessary to maintain exploitative societies, and is an inevitable product of those societies. This conditioning has become embedded in our cultures and so has been passed on from generation to generation, mostly without conscious awareness, as if it were a normal part of being human.
Though the rhetoric of competition has dominated much recent thought (because it justifies exploitation), on close examination it’s clear that it is cooperation that has led to the most interesting developments, both in the evolution of complex life and in human progress.
One of the problems with philosophy overall has been that philosophers (and the people who support them and use their ideas) have come almost exclusively from the sections of society that materially benefited from, and identify with, the unjust structures. So Ethics, which should be asking ‘What is the right thing to do?’ has been distorted by an often-unconscious element of ‘What is the best thing possible within confines of the status quo?’
It seems to me that an awful lot of ethical wrangling has come from trying to find solutions from inside the basic assumptions of an exploitative society, which is not possible since those assumptions are logically inconsistent with human rights.
Instead I think it helps to start from the position that any exploitation of any human being for any purpose is unnecessary and mistaken, and has no place in any rational human society.
Central Ideas
Human beings are capable of high levels of cooperation, love and caring. However, for thousands of years most of us have been living in societies that systematically suppress these human qualities. These inhuman social systems now function to sustain themselves, the systems, not the people within them...
Divide and rule has been used to control populations for thousands of years... This division is not natural or inevitable – we can understand it and undo it; we can build a society organised for the benefit of all people and all life...
When we humans are very young, our fragile minds are sometimes overwhelmed by experiences they can’t yet handle...
Human minds seem to be vulnerable to being hurt emotionally, but also equipped with emotional healing processes...
Other Articles
The title of my talk is Sexism: How men can be allies to women, but this is also about human relationships in general, and how to improve them...
Why do so many of us find it hard to face that, sometimes, what we hold to be true may be wrong?
Why is it so hard for us to change our minds, or to consider new ways of thinking that might be beneficial to us?
This article looks at the future of work and the relationships between work, technology, exploitation and living meaningful lives...
The purpose of this essay is to propose a credible explanation for the long-running conflict in the Middle East...
I think we are often confused about what the word ‘power’ means (in the sense of the human power to make things happen)...
The targeting of any particular group by an oppression is almost never what the oppression is really about... This has been very confusing for many people, especially the people who are targeted...
For thousands of years, all large-scale human societies have been based on exploitation and coercion... I think it will be possible to change this, eventually – to bring about societies that work for the common good...
This was written a few weeks before the General Election of May 2015. A lot of people I talk to are worried about 'letting the Tories back in' by splitting the progressive vote. This loses sight of the bigger picture: that millions of people voted for them...
It's often not possible to solve problems from within the context in which they are presented. Often solutions can only be found by considering a wider context...
This piece first appeared on the Scientists for Global Responsibility forum, in response to post that ended with the comment ‘Ethics are never straightforward!’...
In complex systems, such as a society, there are often ‘layers’ of logic. The logic in each layer often only makes sense within the context of that one layer...
This article looks at why religions can appear to be a source of division, violence and war... It's useful to understand the difference between a religion, and the corruption and manipulation of that religion to support the established social order...
Human beings are capable of high levels of cooperation, love and caring. However, for thousands of years most of us have been living in societies that systematically suppress these human qualities. These inhuman social systems now function to sustain themselves, the systems, not the people within them...
Divide and rule has been used to control populations for thousands of years... This division is not natural or inevitable – we can understand it and undo it; we can build a society organised for the benefit of all people and all life...
When we humans are very young, our fragile minds are sometimes overwhelmed by experiences they can’t yet handle...
Human minds seem to be vulnerable to being hurt emotionally, but also equipped with emotional healing processes...
The title of my talk is Sexism: How men can be allies to women, but this is also about human relationships in general, and how to improve them...
Why do so many of us find it hard to face that, sometimes, what we hold to be true may be wrong? Why is it so hard for us to change our minds, or to consider new ways of thinking that might be beneficial to us?
This article looks at the future of work and the relationships between work, technology, exploitation and living meaningful lives...
The purpose of this essay is to propose a credible explanation for the long-running conflict in the Middle East...
I think we are often confused about what the word ‘power’ means (in the sense of the human power to make things happen)...
The targeting of any particular group by an oppression is almost never what the oppression is really about... This has been very confusing for many people, especially the people who are targeted...
For thousands of years, all large-scale human societies have been based on exploitation and coercion... I think it will be possible to change this, eventually – to bring about societies that work for the common good...
This was written a few weeks before the General Election of May 2015. A lot of people I talk to are worried about 'letting the Tories back in' by splitting the progressive vote. This loses sight of the bigger picture: that millions of people voted for them...
It's often not possible to solve problems from within the context in which they are presented. Often solutions can only be found by considering a wider context...
This piece first appeared on the Scientists for Global Responsibility forum, in response to post that ended with the comment ‘Ethics are never straightforward!’...
In complex systems, such as a society, there are often ‘layers’ of logic. The logic in each layer often only makes sense within the context of that one layer...
This article looks at why religions can appear to be a source of division, violence and war... It's useful to understand the difference between a religion, and the corruption and manipulation of that religion to support the established social order...